The Building Centre Goes Social

We are delighted to announce that we (The Building Centre) and tCn (the Construction Network) have joined forces to form ‘The Building Centre Network’

TBCN Homepage

TBCN Homepage

 

By being built around the physical hub of events and exhibitions that is The Building Centre, and by allowing users to post their own events, the new network allows users to connect and interact with others like never before – bridging the gap between the industry’s on and offline community.

Some of the features of TBCN

View company and personal profiles, add your own free personal profile and share information with colleagues and industry peers…

 

View company and personal profiles

View company and personal profiles

 

Follow companies, people and regional groups for all the latest news, jobs, events and more…

Follow regional groups for all the latest news, jobs, events and more

Follow regional groups for all the latest news, jobs, events and more

 

Post your own events and follow events to reach a wider audience. Post your thoughts and comments before, during and after each event…

Events

Promote your events and connect with others at events.

 

Join or follow our popular Twitter leagues…

Join or follow our popular Twitter leagues

Join or follow our popular Twitter leagues

 

John Bonning, Commercial Director of The Building Centre, commented, “For a while now we’ve been thinking about ways to offer our visitors, members and users a more interactive way to experience the events, products and research we promote.”

He added, ‘tCn were one of the first to offer industry specific social media networking and information sharing.  They’ve built relationships with reputable organisations based on a common objective for the good of the industry. We’re delighted to now look at taking what they’ve already achieved to the next level”.

Founder of tCn, Ryan Briggs, was equally enthusiastic about the new venture, “It’s great to share the tCn vision with such a well-established yet forward thinking organisation.”

He went on, “The Building Centre and tCn’s combined connections represents a large percentage of professionals from many of the recognised industry bodies and trade associations.   The Building Centre’s training, exhibition and event facilities give a unique opportunity for members to connect with each other around real-time activities bringing on and offline networking together. The website now has a new look and feel with complete changes to branding thanks to the team at Yechte Consulting. It’s a good start and now lets us focus on enhanced functionality for users.”

Original associate members Balfour Beatty have shown their ongoing support by renewing their involvement with the project.  Anne Carrigan said, “Balfour Beatty will be working closely with the TBCN team as part of our ongoing plan to reach our target audience while promoting Balfour Beatty.”

Manufacturers subscribing to specifinder.com, can now also enjoy improved functionality from the integration, making The Building Centre a truly central resource for the whole of the built environment.

The Network is live from today and can be accessed at www.buildingcentrenetwork.co.uk

Celotex CPD Presentation on Part L: Simplifying Compliance

It was good to see that Celotex chose The Building Centre once again this year as the venue for their CPD presentation on Building Regs Part L: Simplifying Compliance.

Adrian Fryer, Specification Manager opened the proceedings and spoke of the importance of ‘Fabric First’ an expression recently coined by the government to help drive initiatives to bring down energy consumption in buildings. The latest of these  being ‘The Green Deal’ . His presentation was given excellent support by Area Sales Manager Craig Baxter.

The presentation demonstrated the use of Celotex products which it claimed would simplify compliance with Part L. With a choice of 13 different products, most design specifications can be met.

Adrian told us how Celotex is the first manufacturer of PIR insulation to achieve an A+ Green rating.

We were shown a short video about the company and its manufacturing processes. From this  we learned that Celotex  has been in existence since 1925 and  now boasts a manufacturing plant that is capable of producing one square metre of insulation board per second. Chemicals used in its PIR board production are zero ozone depleting and 60 individual checks are made on samples of each product. The film extolled the excellent properties of PIR products, proven to be more thermally efficient than mineral fibre and 10 times lighter in weight.

Craig Baxter Presents

Craig Baxter Presents

Craig Baxter mentioned the Celotex on line calculator which can be downloaded to an iPad. Members of the audience who had used it agreed that it was easy to use. Craig also talked of the technical support team of six who could be reached by phone or email.  He ran through the different Sections of Part L which apply to different types of buildings, new build, refurbishment, residential and commercial. Several interesting case studies were mentioned including Watermead Business Park, the University of Bedford, Nottingham City Council and Hepworth Gallery in Leeds. Craig said that more information on these case studies and many others could be found on their website. Emphasis was placed on U-values that could be achieved by the much thinner PIR board compared with rockfibre products.

Adrian went through the latest version of Celotex Handy Guide which seems to be very comprehensive and appears to have all the information you could possibly ever need to know about Celotex products and there applications, in a clear to understand format.

There were some interesting questions from the floor in conclusion to the morning. Someone asked ‘Why don’t you do a full fill cavity board?’ John Roper Assistant Product Development Manager was invited to the podium to give a reply. John said that they had been looking into the possibility for some time. Adrian and Craig chipped in saying that they felt  there was still concerns with condensation and a risk of moisture ingress in to the building. Adrian had mentioned earlier in the day that there was an issue with moisture in close cell structure insulation boards and that they were, therefore, not suitable for use below the DPC level because the foil would be likely to delaminate.

Someone commented that, in their experience, a building  insulated with foil faced boards blocked wireless signals and therefore could cause communication problems within the building. It was suggested that this could be overcome by creating dedicated wi-fi hotspots within the building.

John Roper (left) wth Adrian Fryer (right)

John Roper (left) wth Adrian Fryer (right)

Another delegate said they would like Celotex to produce U-values on hybrid insulation solutions: For example, where some Celotex products could be used in conjunction with another brand.  Adrian responded by saying that they couldn’t fairly comment on another company’s product’s performance, (presumably because they don’t test them). He gave the example of multi-foil insulation; out of forty four or so brands on the market only three have BBA Certification.
In conclusion Adrian said that PIR production is the fastest growing business  in the insulation market and that Celotex is working towards BREEAM Excellence and striving to lower the Lambda (the insulating capacity of a product). Part of their environment mission statement is that the amount of CO2 produced in the manufacture of PIR boards is 9 kg  lower than other PIR board manufacturers. Adrian also explained what happens to  PIR waste. It is ground to a powder and pellets are produced which can be used as a base for road building or used as fuel in brick drying kilns. PIR is recycled more in Europe and North America but there is not considered to be enough of this type of waste in the UK to warrant building a PIR waste recycling plant.

Another successful, well attended and I must say, very informative  CPD Presentation from Celotex. It’s always good to welcome Celotex at The Building Centre and we look forward to a closer relationship between us in the following months.

We hope Celotex will decide to have a bigger presence at The Building Centre soon as they are one of the few leading insulation manufacturers not to have physical representation here or an enhanced  entry on specifinder, our online directory. Although, we are pleased to say that one of their main distributors SIG plc is represented.

 

 

Energy Conversations: Green Deal or No Deal?

This was an interesting debate but does the scheme represent a real way forward or six weeks in, is it already dead in the water?

Wednesday 14th November saw the gathering of an informed cross section of experts from Government, finance and industry all interested in making the Green Deal a success.

Peter Farrand of DECC outlined the challenges of the Green Deal and the changes that have taken place since its inception. He told us of the Green Deal quick Guide on DECC’s website which is good for familiarising or re-familiarising oneself with the details.

Green Deal or No Deal? Audience

Green Deal or No Deal? Audience

Each speaker was given five minutes to put across their views and then the audience was invited to join the debate.

An Architect from the floor pointed out that there was a target to be reached of no carbon emissions from housing stock by 2050? He asked would the Green Deal help or hinder the achieving of this target if the average Green Deal was only making energy savings of 15%-20%?

Several speakers talked of ‘the whole house approach’. Peter Farrand believed it should be encouraged and whilst Steven Heath, External Affairs Director for Knauf Insulation agreed with this aspiration, he pointed out that the reality of it was that it could put a large debt on a home for many years, which was proving to be a disincentive for take-up. He gave the example of his own home and estimated that the measures to be taken towards maximum energy saving (The whole house approach) would cost between £12,000 and £15,000. This being paid off as the amount saved on energy costs and at a typical 7% rate of interest did not make a very attractive deal for home owners. He felt that loft, cavity wall insulation, draught proofing and thermostatic radiator valves were probably the most viable improvements to be offered under the Green Deal and that any other improvements would need to be financed by grants.

The unattractiveness of the Green Deal has been borne out by the lack of uptake as reported in the Press at the weekend. Six weeks since the scheme was launched – no applications have been made. The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) attribute the lack of applications to people’s desire to wait until the new year before getting started on large-scale DIY projects. Umm – I wonder?

Could the truth be that it’s all about money? People are happy to become greener, to insulate and save energy if they save money. But they don’t see the reality of this scheme as saving money because to make enough improvements to make significant energy savings, the financial benefit will take a long time to realise. They will be still paying out the same amount to the energy companies in order to pay back the loan for the improvements for quite some time. Remember the bigger the improvement – the bigger the energy saving but the bigger the cost and the longer the time it will take to pay it back.

Would the Green Deal appeal to an elderly pensioner? Probably not – they may not live to enjoy the financial benefit of such improvements, although Ingrid Holmes of E3G pointed out that there are banks that will lend against the value of the property so that the loan could be repaid from their estate on their passing.

Would the Green Deal appeal to a younger couple? Probably not – they may move house before the loan is paid off. In which case they would not only not realise the benefit in their pocket but the loan would go with the house. Would this put the purchaser off? Chairman of the evening, Garry Felgate of Chop Cloc Ltd thought the Green Deal loan on the property should be viewed by mortgage providers as a variation or extension of ground rent or maintenance charges and therefore would not be a handicap to selling.

Peter Farrand, Ingrid Holmes, Paul Weaver and Steven Heath

Peter Farrand, Ingrid Holmes, Paul Weaver and Steven Heath

Ingrid Holmes of E3G took to the podium for her five minutes to talk on issues of financing the Green Deal. She examined whether the Green Deal would appear to be a logical investment for investors who would want to know what the risks would be. The scheme has no track record. Would cowboy builders install measures that failed? What happens if a consumer loses his job and therefore loses his ability to keep up repayments? These questions have resulted in a lack of backers coming forward. Ingrid said that we needed more public capitol investment to reduce interest rates.

Paul Weaver of Mansell Energy spoke from a main contractor’s point of view. He believed that large scale landlords would benefit by taking up the Green Deal.

Steven Heath of Knauf Insulation felt there should be more incentives to drive the scheme and suggested a reduction in stamp duty for buyers of a property with a green deal loan attached to it and perhaps a rise in stamp duty for the least energy efficient properties.

Although the phrase ‘The only game in town’ was bandied about a lot that evening suggesting that the Green Deal is the only way forward I didn’t get a positive vibe from the platform. There are still so many unknowns and questions left unanswered. It will be interesting to see how this one pans out.

I shall look forward to the next in the Energy Conversations series 23rd January 2013.